Friday, April 13, 2007

BBC - What a fu%$*&g disgrace

My hearty congratulations to the BBC and to Harry Enfield and Paul Whitehouse for sinking to the depths in their latest "comedy show". The highlight of the new agenda driven show was Harry Enfield and Paul Whitehouse portraying Laurel and Hardy.

The sketch climaxed with "Ollie" bending "Stan" over and buggering him. When their wives turned up apparently "Ollie's" penis was stuck inside "Stan's" arse and it's removal was accompanied by a cork popping sound.

Having been a fan of Laurel and Hardy all my life I am disgusted by this utter s*&t.

Having not heard much from Harry Enfield recently, I can honestly say that I hope I never hear from this c%$t again.

Congratulations to all who contributed to this depravity, just when you thought the BBC had plumbed the depths they show their utter contempt for decency.

Labour election fraud

In the run up to the local elections I thought I would post a link to this news item in the Times from a while back.

I am always amused when the main parties presume to lecture everyone on the criminality of a certain party without ever providing proof.

Fortunately there is a handy resource which lists the countless members and representatives of their parties that have committed offences, and in many cases very serious ones indeed.

It can be found here: Liars, Buggers and Thieves

It will be interesting to see whether this years elections will be free and fair or whether Nu Labour will continue to live up to it's reputation as the party that would disgrace a banana republic.

Labour election fraud ‘would disgrace a banana republic’

Thursday, April 12, 2007

They died proudly serving their country.




The four servicemen and women killed in Iraq last week. Clockwise from top left: Second Lieutenant Joanna Dyer, Private Eleanor Dlugosz, Corporal Kris O'Neill, Kingsman Adam Smith

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

News feed

Since we placed the news feed on the site it has thrown up a few interesting articles and I will unashamedly copy and paste a letter from the Hendon and Finchley Times. I am sure they will let us know if we shouldn't.

Whilst it is depressing to know that each day you get up and look at the news you find what may be considered another nail in the coffin of this once great country, it is heart warming to see that not all is lost:

Letters

Sanctimonious MP should look at his own party in racism debate

It's a bit rich of sanctimonious MP Andrew Dismore to lecture us all about racism when his New Labour Government has presided over the biggest rise in racial tensions that this country has ever seen.

The mass influx of hapless immigrants coming to the UK to find work are being cynically exploited by this government, not only as voting fodder to keep Labour permanently in power, but also as slave labour to suit New Labour's greedy and ruthless capitalist friends.

We only have to remember the Chinese cockle pickers, who died as a result of Labour's lack of protection for immigrant workers, to know who the real racists in our country are.

Incidentally, the anti-white racism and anti-Christian abuse in Britain today has resulted in a terrifying situation. The indigenous population and Christians in particular are now completely alienated, demoralised and discriminated against in their own country.

When New Labour came to power, there were only a handful of British National Party councillors and now there are more than 50.

So much for Mr Dismore and his so-called anti-racist' party.

Sarah Baxter

The buck stops with me.... now move on.

The defence secretary says he takes full responsibility for decisions which allowed the 15 sailors and marines held by the Iranians to sell their stories.
Des Browne, speaking for the first time since the row, said with hindsight he could have done things differently and said "ultimately, the buck stops here".

And ..... what now?

There was a time when taking responsibility meant actually just that, when the phrase "the buck stops here" preceded some sort of serious action and in all probability the resignation of the said individual.

Sadly, as with everything that is NU Labour, the usual conventions do not apply. Time and again they come on the television, apologise that things are not as they should be, tell us that lessons will be learnt and then go back to their troughs and produce more of the same.

As for Mr Cameron, we now hear what he thinks about the Government and MOD's initial decision to let the sailors sell their story. I guess we would have heard from him earlier but I suspect it took a couple of days for his focus groups to let him know what his opinion was.

Mr Browne is due to make a statement on Monday: for his handling of this debacle and for his complicity in the deaths of all our servicemen I hope he resigns, but I won't hold my breath.

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

BBC News? Is there any point?

Scenes of violence outside mosque

Police have launched an investigation after violent clashes involving up to 200 people outside a mosque.

The clashes, which lasted five hours, followed tensions among people who use the mosque and is the second such incident in two years, police said.

Reading the story, it is very difficult to understand quite what is going on. Is it reporting that a group of Mosque - goers were attacked and the police are calling on the local community for calm OR is it that disparate groups of muslims engaged in fighting outside the Mosque for the second time in two years and the police are asking the muslim community for calm and good sense?

The answer would be easy if the BBC actually carried out it's role as a news service rather than a propaganda ministry.

Time will tell.

Monday, April 09, 2007

What a farce!

First they are not allowed to under MOD guidelines, then they are allowed to and now they are not!

Defence Secretary Des Browne said the Navy had faced a "very tough call" over its decision to allow the sailors among the 15 hostages to take payments in return for their accounts - the first of which were published today.
But he said everyone concerned recognised it had "not reached a satisfactory outcome" and lessons must be learned from a review of procedures ordered by the Ministry of Defence.
"I want to be sure those charged with these difficult decisions have clear guidance for the future," he said in his first comment on the controversy.


Clear guidance ....... NuLAbour........ Yet another example of Government by spin and focus groups.

You just couldn't make this lot up.

Labour 'facing large BNP challenge'

Jon Cruddas said the BNP was putting up 750 candidates - more than double the 350 it fielded in last year's local elections in England. Actually I believe it is 828!

The MP for Dagenham, east London, where the BNP won 11 council seats last year, said the BNP was "thriving" in some poor areas - particularly former Labour heartlands, where it was positioning itself as an alternative to the main parties. The BNP is thriving in plenty of areas, many of which are not poor at all as I am sure will be shown in the upcoming elections.

"The BNP is attempting to capitalise on peoples feelings of insecurity," he said.
Hmm, I wonder where this insecurity comes from?

"We have less than a month to convince people that the BNP represent a very real threat to communities and they should not be considered as a viable alternative to the mainstream parties or even to register a protest vote."

A threat to communities. I'm sorry Mr Cruddas but very few people are listening to you and your kind anymore. Why would we be interested in anything you have to say. We have had 10 years of Nu Labour during which time you could easily have convinced us that there is no viable alternative to your party by improving the country rather than turning it into the depraved lawless s&*t hole that it now is.

No, we have seen what it is to be run by Nu Labour, we have heard from both the other main parties that we could expect more of the same from them.

All this thugs, racist, sleaze anti-British crap you and your kind continue to spout doesn't wash anymore.

In the words of an honorable politician and patriot to his country:


"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time."


Your time is up.


Cruddas

There all at it now!


Fury as bishops back Iran

The Roman Catholic bishop who oversees the armed forces has provoked fury by praising the Iranian leadership for its "forgiveness" and "act of mercy" in freeing the 15 British sailors and marines last week.

The Bishop of the Forces, the Rt Rev Tom Burns, said that the religious beliefs of the Iranians had played a large part in their decision to release the hostages after holding them for more than two weeks.

Bishop Burns said he had issued an appeal to Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, "in the name of his nation and in the name of Islam", to free the sailors and marines, but he could not be sure whether his appeal had reached the authorities in Iran.
He added that the Iranian's Islamic faith shared many religious values with Christianity. "Over the past two weeks, there has been a unity of purpose between Britain and Iran, whereby everyone has sought justice and forgiveness where that is appropriate," he said.


A unity of purpose between Britain and Iran? Does that extend then to Britain wishing to blow Israel off the face of the earth? Is this one of the many values that Christianity share with sections of the Islamic faith? The illegal seizure and contravention of the Geneva convention, the tying up, blindfolding and threatening of personnel is justice?

His words were echoed by a leading Anglican figure, the Right Rev Michael Nazir-Ali, the Bishop of Rochester, who said Iran had acted within the "moral and spiritual tradition of their country" and contrasted this with Britain's "free-floating attitudes".

Do these people not pay attention to what is going on around the world? Are they not aware of the extermination of Christians that is taking place in so many countries and regions that are under militant and extremist control? What about the Pope's Easter message:
".........terrorism and kidnapping of people, of the thousand faces of violence which some people attempt to justify in the name of religion, of contempt for life, of the violation of human rights and the exploitation of persons."

The Government, the media, the BBC, the Senior Officers in the Armed Services, the MOD and the Church; isn't there anyone who has the patriotism and courage of their convictions to stand up for Britain and Christianity anymore?

Fury as bishops back Iran

Sunday, April 08, 2007

The Rt Rev Tom Butler, the Bishop of Southwark apologises for terrorist activities of Islamic extremists.

Tony Blair's decision to invade Iraq contributed to the London bombings of July 7 2005, according to a leading Church of England bishop.
The Rt Rev Tom Butler, the Bishop of Southwark, said that mistakes in the Government's foreign policy had damaged society and radicalised Muslims, leaving them alienated and resentful.

The frightening thing about 7/7 is that they seemed to be ordinary young men from Leeds who didn't look to be fanaticals, but they'd become sufficiently alienated to take this action.

Hmm, no money so driven to petty larceny maybe. Late for work so decided to break the speed limit perhaps. Unhappy with Government foreign policy so take explosives and place them in buses and trains to blow up and decapitate fellow citizens to make a point? NO!

Thank God the rest of the population that absolutely detests this NU Labour dictatorship are more able to control ourselves!

When is the Leadership of the Church of England going to wise up? Is this what passes for moral guidance in their opinion?

The number of people attending Church of England services in this country is in decline, it isn't hard to see why.

Iraq invasion fuelled 7/7 anger, says bishop

Curious incident in the night leaves Bishop of Southwark with black eye and sore head

Navy 15 to sell story.

Fortunately some in this country still know what patriotism is.

The 15 Navy personnel captured by the Iranians were thankfully released unharmed. People have expressed differing views of their conduct ranging from their actions being seen as heroic through to cowardly.

Whatever their actions were, a professional armed service described by Senior Officers as the "best in the world" should not have serving Officers and enlisted men behaving as cheap celebrities from a reality TV show.

I understand that not all of the sailors and marines intend to receive payment for their story and I commend this position.

To any who do and keep the money, shame on you. Shame on your Senior Officers, shame on the MOD and most importantly shame on Blair and this bankrupt administration for bringing disgrace to this nation.

Friday, April 06, 2007

The end of the world?

I just caught a bit on the news regarding global warming. Well, it's been a couple of weeks since we were treated to it so I guess we were due.

Anyway, it turns out that the intergovernmental panel on climate change have found out that the public has already put to much CO2 into the atmosphere to stop global warming.

It appears that Governments must take control of the situation in order to protect the public.

Apparently the way forward is for the Government to introduce additional controls on the public.

In addition, the Government needs to introduce a lot of new taxes, paid for by the public.

Hmmm!

Released sailors tell of ordeal


Royal Navy personnel seized by Iran were blindfolded, bound and held in isolation during their 13 days in captivity, the crew have said.

We are glad to have them back. To all those people on various blogs and comment pages who have congratulated the Iranians for the way they behaved during this incident and the way in which they treated the captives, I hope you pay close attention.

The same sort of rhetoric that came from Iran allowing you to feel so secure in your cosy world where there are no bad people just "misunderstood ones" has been shown for what it is.

Everyday the threat from these groups grows stronger and stronger and yet you act as apologists and sympathisers for their cause.

Throughout the Middle East barbaric acts are being carried out; men, women and children are being murdered on a daily basis and you apologise and say it is because the perpetrators have themselves been treated badly, are misunderstood, it is not their fault .......... and so on.

Perhaps this incident and the glaring differences between the Iranian account and the account of the victims will finally open your eyes to what is going on.

Reading the comments on the MODERATED BBC page it is clear that a lot of people have the view that the treatment of the Navy personnel is quite justified compared to the treatment by the Americans to those held in Guantanamo Bay.

You are no longer just misguided, you are no longer just an embarrassment to the rest of us, in the war against terrorism, you are traitors.

Iranian Ordeal

Thursday, April 05, 2007

Democracy my arse!

From Wales:

Politicians from all parties have put their differences aside in a bid to oppose the far-right British National Party.

All parties except the BNP presumably?

At a meeting in the Glamorgan Muslim Community Centre, Aberkenfig, near Bridgend, on Saturday, politicians including Environment Minister and Bridgend AM Carwyn Jones and Plaid Cymru candidate Bethan Jenkins pledged their commitment to tackling discrimination against ethnic minorities.

What about discrimination against ethnic majorities?

The Bridgend Unite Against Fascism Group, which organised the gathering, believes the BNP is a racist party which poses a threat to democracy and freedom.

Aha, that clears it all up then. What poses a threat to democracy and freedom? Is it a legally constituted party that behaves at all times in a democratic way by campaigning on the issues and seeking election with a mandate from the people? Or is the threat to democracy from groups who have already severely restricted freedom of speech, groups who subvert the election process by attempting to intimidate law abiding members of the public who are going about their lawful right to campaign for any legal party they wish to?

Who are these people to force their undemocratic views on the people in the name of democracy? Anyone who attempts to take away people's right to participate in free and fair elections has no right whatsoever to claim they stand against facism, let alone for freedom and democracy.

If the BNP is a racist party which poses a threat to democracy and freedom then I am sure that no one will vote for them.

That is democracy, that is freedom.

Unite against freedom

Greens want to axe Catholic schools.

THE Greens have called for the abolition of Catholic schools in Scotland.

The party, who hope to win at least 10 seats at Holyrood, have included moves for Catholic schools to be integrated into a secular state system in their manifesto.

Green leader Robin Harper claimed that having separate schools "tends to divide communities".

He said: "Catholic children, for most of their time in primary and secondary, do not mix with other children.

"And children who are non-Catholics do not, because the Catholics are educated separately, tend to mix so much with them.


A spokesman for the Catholic Church said: "It is unfortunate that the Greens want to trample on the rights of Catholic parents and the thousands of other parents who aren't Catholics but choose a Catholic education for their kids.
"This is an outrageous proposal."


Mr Harper is of course entitled to his views as are his party. However, I am always intrigued when people of this nature choose to be selective regarding who they criticise. Why single out Catholic schools? Why not call for the abolition of certain other religious schools? After all, to my knowledge there is only one faith that is in the process of opening more faith schools. Where are the Greens calls for their abolition?

Apart from attacking an established church in Britain, what else does the Green party have in mind?

Apart from the scrapping of improvements to transport infrastructure in Scotland in the name of "global warming", the Greens oppose the way young people have been "demonised" using anti-social behaviour powers and are robustly on the side of civil liberties and asylum seekers.

Shiona Baird, the Greens' co-convener, said: "If you have voted Green in the past, there could be no more important time to do so again. If you are voting for the first time, or considering voting Green for the first time, I urge you to back our vision for a socially just and internationally responsible Scotland."

"Socially just"; provided you fit in with their vision and are not from the wrong religious group is that?

Typical day in London.

3000 shoppers forced their way into the new Primark store on Oxford Street.

Queues were so bad that customers at the back of the queue wait almost 2 hours to enter the store. This was despite the fact that there were no bargains to be had and any customer who wanted to could have taken a short bus ride to the Hammersmith store and bought exactly the same stuff at the same price!

Is this the future for Britain?

The battle of Primark

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Navy personnel to be released from captivity.

It truly is excellent news that the 15 members of the British Navy who were illegally seized by the Iranians in an act of war on the United Kingdom are to be released.

I have already read on several comments pages on the MSM and on several blogs that this act vindicates Blair's Governments cowardly stance on the whole affair.

Maybe we will truly continue to see peace in our time through appeasement and the rewarding of terrorists and rogue states. Who knows what is in the wind, 25 years since the Falklands and new calls for a return of the Malvinas to Argentina along with the "renegotiation" of ownership of oil rights in the region.

Britain under Blair and Nu Labour has become like a wounded animal, let's hope that are friends in the EU can keep the wolves at bay!

After all, with 80 odd percent of our laws coming from them and such a large net contribution from our economy, I am sure they will be only too pleased to speak up and act on our behalf, just like they did during this latest crisis. Didn't they?

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

Police priorities!

Interesting article regarding the priorities of the North Wales police service. It always suprises me how the police magically finds officers to spare when it comes to arresting anyone who doesn't fall into line with Nu Labour's dream.


The North Wales Police State?

Reduced crime risk continued........

A police force has admitted to letting off almost 100 sexual offenders with a caution in the last five years.

Figures reveal that no charges were brought by West Mercia Constabulary against 93 sex offenders - including eight rapists - between April 1 2001 and March 31 2006.
Instead of going to court, they were given a caution.


According to a police spokeswoman, "West Mercia Constabulary is committed to bringing offenders to justice and protecting members of the public. "

Cautions were given for 41 indecent assaults, eight rapes, 17 sexual assaults, nine sexual activity cases (including with a child), one gross indecency with a child, six unlawful sexual intercourse cases and 11 other sexual offences.

The spokeswoman continued. "When an individual accepts a caution, it is important to remember that a person must admit wrongdoing in order to receive a caution and it represents an admission of guilt."

A caution for rape, a caution for gross indecency with a child ... protecting members of the public...... is it me or is there something not quite compatible about the two statements?

I have always supported the police in the past, but when I read things like this I truly believe that they are wasting their time. They may as well disband and let everyone spend their tax money on their own personal security. At least that way someone will genuinely be concerned for their safety.

NU Labour's police service, to protect and serve .... but who?

Modern policing

Public fearful despite reduced crime risk!

Firstly, let's clear this up right away. There is NO reduced crime risk, just the downgrading of so many offences to ensure that the figures say what Nu Labour want them to. How long will it be before armed robbery, GBH and aggravated burglary are downgraded?

I look forward to the day that Nu Labour announces that crime has totally been eradicated in the UK.

Anyway, despite all the NU Labour lies regarding crime statistics, such is the failure of their spin machine these days, it appears that they are struggling to fool many of the people:

Three-quarters of people believe Britain is more dangerous today than it was five years ago, a survey has found.

In a blow for the Government, more than half of the public say they are so scared of yobs and crime they avoid certain areas, and four out of ten will not go out at night on foot.


Four out of ten have become so worried they have beefed up their home security.
Alarmingly, some 61 per cent felt frightened of being alone at home during the night - with 14 per cent hiding a weapon close to the bed.


Welcome to Blair's Britain - tough on the victims of crime.

Since 1998, Violence against the person is up 111 per cent - from 502,788 incidents to 1,059,913 last year.
Sexual offences are up 72 per cent from 36,174 to 62,081. And robbery is up 47 per cent - from 66,835 crimes to 98,204.


Crime is up, the prisons are full, taxes are up, the national health service is in terminal decline, unemployment is rising, housing shortage continues to affect the British population, utility bills are out of control.

Still, as far as NU Labour is concerned we have all benefited from multicultural enrichment so I guess we've never had it so good.

Nu Labour, what a bunch of lying c*&%s.

Nu Labour failure

Monday, April 02, 2007

Teachers drop the Holocaust to avoid offending Muslims

As part of the continued downward spiral of educational standards it should come as no shock to find that the latest casualty is history lessons. What does come as a shock though is that this time it is not just a matter of dumbing down the lessons and adjusting the emphasis so as to marginalise the majority indigenous population in favour of glorious integration policies.

This time, schools are dropping the Holocaust from history lessons to avoid offending Muslim pupils, because some teachers are reluctant to cover the atrocity for fear of upsetting students whose beliefs include Holocaust denial.

Now whilst I understand that history can be somewhat subjective, are we to now assume that those schools and teachers involved agree with the historical detail of the holocaust or not?

Because if the curriculum looks at the second world war and does not mention the holocaust, then guess what, you are denying it.

Perhaps those teachers who support the dropping of historical facts from the curriculum should be reminded that Holocaust Denial is a criminal offence in the following European countries punishable by the associated sentences:

Austria: 6 months - 20 years
Belgium: Fine - 1 year
Czech Republic: 6 months - 2 years
France: Fine or 1 month - 2 years
Germany: Fine or 1 month- 5 years
Israel: 1 year - 5 years
Italy (law against racial discrimination): 3 years - 4 years
Lithuania: Fine or 2 years -10 years
Poland: Fine or 3 months - 3 years, Romania: 6 months or 3-5 years

With extradition treaties between all European states, and groups pressing for Holocaust Denial to become an EU wide offence, let us hope that these teachers find it in themselves to have the "courage" to tell the truth regardless of how inconvenient it may be lest they find themselves with the conviction instead.

Sunday, April 01, 2007

Ordinary Citizen

A bit pressed for time today so I am posting an interesting piece off a political website. (Let me know if not ok)

I feel it sums up the views of many many people.


"A Daily Mirror reader has had an interesting and in our opinion, accurate letter printed in that newspaper - which, as we all know, is currently engaged in campaigning against the BNP on behalf of the Labour Party. On a point of fact the author of the letter is incorrect on one small point - the Daily Mirror is not owned by a "millionaire" (the thief, Robert Maxwell is long gone - thank goodness) but by the largely foreign-owned Trinity Mirror Group - yes - the Daily Mirror and the scores of local newspapers owned by that financially struggling group, is largely foreign owned!

The Letter.

Let’s face it Ros, this "campaign" is a very wispy smoke screen to cover a direct attack on the BNP and its policies just before the May elections.As such it is the type of subterfuge to get around the rules on election expenditure which we have come to expect from Nu Labour and its supporters i.e. although it’s an abuse of the spirit of the law it does not quite break it!

Your multimillionaire and Labour supporting publisher (who controls your copy through his control of who is editor) knows Labour has lost the trust of whole swathes of the white working class who predominantly make up the Mirrors readership.
They also know much of this support has gone to the BNP rather than the Liberals or the Tories, so he is using his ability to buy influence (i.e. the resources of this paper) to attack both individual members of the BNP like Nick Griffin and the party itself in this campaigns handout.

All hate and no hope there then!

It is therefore farcical to claim shock or indignation when the BNP point out the hollowness of your message in their opinion.Why didn't you offer a link to their response so that readers could decide for themselves?

Because you are afraid of allowing people to make there own mind up, rather than having you filter it and put your own spin as usual?

Please no nonsense about not wanting to promote hate, that excuse has well past its sell by date I am afraid.

Really, it’s about time you realised we ordinary people are not as gullible as we once unfortunately were. We just don’t trust you anymore, because you have proven false time after time.

Just take a long hard look at who actually attends your events; the only ordinary people you will find are there for the freebies, not because they share your beliefs, so stop kidding yourselves.

The British people are very angry and getting more so by the day, not with immigrants, asylum seekers or the BNP, but with the likes of you who have brought this country to an all time low and insist we should be grateful.

Maybe someday you can explain to the mothers of the child groomer’s victims up north how their children were selected because the perpetrators were "poor" and that the fact that none of the victims were Muslim was for the same reason.

Maybe you can explain to the school leaver who is best qualified for the job that his grandfather and father had that he can't have it because he is a native Britain and it must go to someone of another race who is less qualified because of "positive" discrimination and quotas.

Maybe you can explain why it is not raciest to imply that because they are mostly white an organisation the police is incapable of dealing fairly with other racial groups in their communities and needs lots of "ethnic" recruits but it would be raciest for a mainly white neighbourhood to ask for a white bobby.

Maybe you can explain why it’s still common for mainly white old people to have their care home shut, to freeze to death or to starve on a hospital ward because there is "no money" to keep it open, fund their heating bill (or explain how to claim the grant) or have someone to feed them so they don't choke.

But there is money to house thousands of asylum seekers and economic migrants, print government leaflets in every language under the sun (and fund translation services) and treat African Nationals with Aid’s for £250,000 a pop.

You don’t get more hateful than allowing your own old to die as far as most people are concerned, especially when you have the tax money and CHOOSE to spend it elsewhere.

Truly if anyone displays hatred it is those who perpetuate or support myths about the BNP. They create a climate in which people who do not share your views face violence and intimidation not for what they actually say or do but because of what campaigns like this say about them.

Oh, and if you ever want to see a baying mob, spitting, hurling abuse and desperate to attack people because they dare to be different from what the mob feels acceptable try watching an ANTI BNP demo, that is pure mindless hate at its worst as many a policeman would testify if his job were not on the line.

Still let’s try and remain positive.

At least the shrinking band of well healed mostly white middle class multiculturalists you represent are increasingly seen by both the native population and the disparate bands of other races as increasingly irrelevant. It is we as separate and unique cultural groups who will have to work to create the future, not those who seek to paper over the fault lines they have created purely out of a hatred of this countries people and culture.

Now I know that you will not put this up (although you may edit it to suit your ends), so why did I bother writing it. Well in the spirit of Hope, all be it a probably very forlorn one, that you will realize you are the problem not the solution.

That your creed is as about as raciest as it gets, because it is so anti the ordinary people of these lands and their right to a space of their own to practice their ancient culture that it fails to see its own hypocrisy.

You support the claims of Aborigines in Australia, Native Americans but not the British – mad when you think about it!"

Peter Woodhams R.I.P.


Saturday, March 31, 2007

Independence for Scotland

For a while now we have been displaying the Union Jack (good
enough for me) on the side of the page and wondering whether 300 years of Union would outlast 10 years of Nu Labour.

Looking forward to the Scottish Assembly elections it seems
entirely feasible that the breakup of the Union may indeed be a distinct possibility.
It strikes me as ironic that a Government hell bent on forcing integration on the British public cannot even claim the successful integration of the English and Scottish people after 300 years!

Still, as an Englishman who has seen his country ravaged under Nu Labour, having seen my taxes being used to pay for services that are available only in Scotland I have changed my mind. As simple as that. If the majority in Scotland want independence, and at the same time remove Nu Labours mandate in England and Brown' "right" to be Prime Minister, then fine.

Goodbye and good luck.

Two Hundred Thousand Asylum Seekers to get Amnesty



Up to 200,000 asylum seekers will be allowed to remain in Britain because Home Office officials admit they will never be able to track them down.
The extraordinary amnesty is the latest embarrassment for Home Secretary John Reid, who has staked his reputation on his pledge to make the department 'fit for purpose'.
So says the article in the Daily Mail:
Nu Labour Failure - Again

Home Office officials also stated that 18,000 immigrants are set to be deported because they have committed crimes in the UK.

18000 immigrants - a quarter of the prison population, 25%.

A Home Office spokesperson said: "We remain confident that we will be able to clear the entire current legacy of cases by July 2011."

2011 - 4 years from now, and yet still they come!

John Reid has staked his reputation on his pledge to make the department fit for purpose. Where to start! The only reputation Mr Reid has is the one he shares with the rest of the reckless, duplicitous, anti-British traitors and liars that riddle this Government and NU Labour at all levels.

And as for embarrassment, don't make me laugh. When will people wake up to the fact that nothing embarrasses these people; they don't care about what you think of them, they don't care what you think of their policies, they don't care what you think of what they have done to your country, they don't care about you at all, not even the tiniest bit.

Nu Labour may have already caused irreparable damage to this country, and yet where are the voices of opposition? Looking to Cameron or Campbell for any sort of opposition is a total waste of time. They stand idly by as this country is turned into the cesspool of the world.

Is it not enough that we have seen our freedoms severely curtailed, taxes raised to an all time high, waiting times (real waiting times not massaged Government figures) for medical treatment at an all time high, deaths in hospital from super bugs at an all time high, huge numbers of the population unable to get access to a dentist, unemployment (real unemployment not massaged Government figures) at an all time high, crime rates (real crime rates not massaged Government figures) at an all time high, our Armed Forces reduced to third world levels and no longer able to provide the necessary support for our brave service men and women, Health and safety rules beyond all reason, stiffer sentences for dropping a Ginsters wrapper than for committing assault, speeding motorists surcharged to pay for domestic violence teams!, being told to apologise (and pay compensation) for something that came to an end 200 years ago (200 years for f%$#s sake), and many many many other things that have befallen our once great nation.

As a well known man recently said: "I am conscious that when an essential core of our democratic freedom risks being undermined, subsequent generations will hold to account those who were able to raise their voices yet stayed silent."

Where are the voices of opposition?

I'll tell you where, HERE!

Friday, March 30, 2007

British Jobs for British Workers


I had meant to post about the recently formed union a while ago but I got side tracked.
Anyway, the name says it all, the link is here, follow it and it will tell you far more about them than I could so there you go.

Iran declares war on Great Britain - Tony Blair share the nations dismay!

In what is clearly an act of war against our country, the Iranian government captures 15 British sailors and parades them in front of the camera for all the world to see.

What does Tony Blair do? What can he do? He and his Government have run our armed forces into the ground. The fact that the Iranians snatched the British navy personnel by using small boats does not come as any surprise as due to Tony and the rest, the Iranian navy may well soon be superior to our own.

As for the EU and the UN, what a waste of space they are. As usual, if you are not an "oppressed minority" (in their opinion) then you are not worth sticking up for.

Mr Blair, Government Ministers, main opposition parties in the UK, you are all a complete and utter disgrace.

You have let down the men and women you sent to fight in your name, you have let down the "British" people.

For God's sake go and let this country be run by people who have loyalty to the electorate and the courage and backbone to fight for what is right.

In the coming elections, I for one will be voting for the British National Party as they are the only party that represents the views and rights of the British people; the only party that would not send our troops off on world policing duties in the first place, but if our troops found themselves in this situation, would back them to the hilt.

I will be voting for them; if you care about this country and despair at what you hear on a daily basis, are disgusted by the sheer criminality and contempt shown by our Government towards it's own people, I suggest you do the same.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

Thank you to Britain.

If he were alive today, I am sure my Great Great Great Great Great Great Great Grandfather would be pleased to receive the warm thanks and generous words from the grateful masses regarding his part in the abolition of slavery and subsequent enforcement of this around the world.

I imagine he would be very disappointed to hear that despite his best efforts, slavery is still very much a part of daily life in some wider reaches of the globe.

Still, with all the celebrations to mark his success, it's surely just a matter of time before all the wonderful caring people who are so deeply involved in the commemoration turn their attention to those nations and those people who still engage in this barbarous trade.

Isn't it?

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Senior Judge decrees: Prisoners should not be deprived of their civil rights!

A convicted armed robber has won a landmark legal action claiming that a recorded message on his calls from prison breached his human rights.

The prisoner, who is at Glenochil in Clackmannanshire, said the words - "This call originates from a Scottish prison" - also "inhibited his social rehabilitation" and was embarrassing.

A 21 year sentence for assault and robbery, still, being robbed and or assaulted is in no way embarrassing so I can see where he is coming from.

A judge at the Court of Session in Edinburgh ruled that the message was unlawful under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Lord Glennie cited Article 8 of the Convention, which provides that everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.


Well, the European Convention on Human Rights is there to protect us all and to ensure that we are all respected in terms of our privacy and in our homes. Still, being robbed or assaulted in no way undermines the respect shown to the victims, so I can see where he is coming from.

He said: "In some societies it might be regarded as obvious that a person convicted of a criminal offence and sentenced to a period of imprisonment should, for the duration of his imprisonment, be deprived of his civil rights.

It seems totally obvious to me, and I am sure it does to the vast and overwhelming majority of law abiding citizens of this country.

"Such a notion has no place in our society."

What the $%&*!

One thing is clear, in this country under NULabour and the current judiciary -

justice, decency and honesty, such notions have no place in our society.

UK Armed forces racist - John Smith an enlightened NULabour MP

UK armed forces 'institutionally racist' - so says John Smith (NuLabour MP) .

""The UK's armed forces are failing to recruit enough ethnic minorities because they are institutionally racist" he claims.

John Smith - who spent four years in the RAF - said it was the only explanation for the fact that less than 10,000 of the UK's 200,000 personnel were from ethnic minorities."


The only explanation!

He added: "I am not saying that people in the armed forces, individuals, are racists. I have no knowledge of that.
"What I am saying is that the armed forces are, by definition, de facto institutionally racist and it's about time this Parliament did something about it."


I tell you what you should do Mr Smith, and that is introduce quotas. That will solve your problem once and for all. That will sort out all the institutional racism once and for all. And whilst we're at it, lets have quotas based on sexuality and maybe even religious beliefs.

Of course, that might be a little problematic for this Government, as it seems that organisations can only be truly institutionally racist when they are "hideously white". I wonder if there are any organisations that under a quota system would be found to be not white enough? Hmm, I wonder.

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Nobby Says

As Leonard said in the previous post, rather than start afresh we have decided to carry on with this blog. On he grounds that two heads are better than one, I will now also be posting on the site and look forward to any comments you may like to make.

Anonymity is a quality that makes the Internet unique (a quality that is under constant threat, I might add) in that it affords a greater opportunity for free speech than appears to be granted under the oppressive regime currently operating in this country and across the whole of the EU.

The downside is that it is easy to post on other blogs as whomsoever you wish, and I have noticed that I have apparently commented on some blogs, as has Leonard, when in fact we have not. To this end, any post we make in future will be linked to this blog, so if it isn't linked, it isn't us.

We both hold the same views regarding the legitimacy of Israel to not only exist, but to defend that right at all costs, and we both come from a Christian background and will always uphold our right to worship in any way we wish. We do not require others to follow our doctrine, nor do we expect others to impose theirs.

As white heterosexual males in England we are all too aware that we are at the bottom of the pecking order and, as far as many people are concerned, we are solely responsible for all the evils in the world.

Unlike Leonard, I like the occasional profanity as I feel it can punctuate what you are trying to say.

Therefore to those that say we are responsible for the oppression of all nations, all ethnic groups, the subjugation of women and even for the sky falling in, I say:

BOLLOCKS.

To all the self hating apologists in this country I have one thing to say, but as I am a guest on this blog I invite you to use your imagination as to what it might be!

Finally, there is a piece of code on the page that links to any site that links to ours. Feel free to link to us and we will automatically link back. Alternatively, if you would like to e-mail either myself or Leonard for reciprocal links we will be happy to do so, or indeed put it in any comment section of a post.

Free speech used to mean something in this country, we may not like what you have to say but we will always put our money where our mouth is and uphold it at all costs.

However, to uphold this standard, we will only link to sites that are also prepared to uphold the spirit of free speech. We feel that the reciprocal link code allows for this in that it will only link to sites that have linked to us and therefore even if they have a different point of view they have given visitors the opportunity to see what we have to say. What more could one ask for ?

Tuesday, February 13, 2007

Welcome back

You know what, we are back. After some consideration, we decided to keep this blog going rather than start a new one as we had planned.

In our absence it appears that someone has been a naughty boy (or girl) and has been penning our name to some posts on one or two other blogs, tut tut. Still, that's the Internet for you, you never quite know who is who!

Just to clear up a mystery that may have been worrying some occasional visitors to this blog, Deakin is Blue is a homage to a band we both liked in our younger days and also to the fact that so many things in modern day Britain make us sad, and also that it fits in with my name! Clever huh!!!!!!!!!!!!

It is does not mean we are Tories! (Incidentally, aren't they symbolised by a green twig or something now?)

Anyway, I, along with my good friend Nobby will be back and posting from the weekend, so if you want to take a look now and then, feel free; if not I'm sure you won't even be reading this so that's OK too!

Monday, January 29, 2007

Thank you and goodnight.

I have cheated and deleted this post, bad form I know but it is my Blog so hey, what you gonna do!

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Read it or weep.

Quite often I read articles that are critical of someone or something and it is clear that the author has either never actually seen what it is they are writing about, or at best have only glanced at it.

Take a recent example where Ken Livingstone criticised Jade Goody for making comments about Shipla Shetty which in fact were made by Shilpa Shetty about Jade Goody. Red Ken "knew" that Jade Goody was in the wrong because he was told so, and as this particular story had previously been covered in one of the papers Ken may read, also incorrectly, perhaps this is where the information came from.

Whilst there is always more than one point of view, I believe it behoves someone to at least take a proper look themselves before passing comment and if they feel unable to spend the time necessary then maybe they should make no comment.

Nu Labour, the main stream media and certain affiliated political organisations thrive on the fact that most people do not bother to read anything properly, and therefore they can manage public opinion with sound bites, half truths, innuendo and just plain lies.

Many blogs exist so that people may have the opportunity to see a different perspective on the news and indeed to be able to see the news that the MSM refuses to publish. Whilst everyone has their own agenda, most readers would at least like to think that the writer(s) had at least took the time to do the most basic of research.

If commenting on stories, articles issues and other people's blogs is to be taken seriously, one should at least be able to demonstrate that they have read more than the sidebar.

Lite blogging

Will be a bit quiet on the posting front for the next couple of days as I am very busy in the real world due to a need to raise an additional £30 by the end of February!

Should be back to normal by the middle of next week.

Thursday, January 25, 2007

No room for justice

I am taking a bit of a liberty by cutting and pasting from the comments section at the Daily Mail. If anyone objects, let me know and I'll take it off. It talks about the consequences of the prison fiasco and what I see as the Governments culpability in the death of an innocent woman.

There is already a crime of corporate manslaughter, why not one for Government manslaughter?

It's a terrifyingly familiar story. Twice the courts had the chance to put drug addict Sean Francis behind bars for beating his girlfriend and threatening to kill her. Twice they let him walk free.

So what happened next? Less than 24 hours after his second release, it emerged yesterday, Francis stabbed Wendy Billing to death in front of their toddler son.
There'll be many more cases like that in the months ahead.

When Francis struck last September, magistrates and judges were already under intense pressure from the Home Office to ease prison overcrowding by granting bail and awarding non-custodial sentences.

Today Ministers have cranked up that pressure tenfold, with a panic-stricken letter to the courts urging them to set free all but the most serious criminals.

How could they so shamelessly neglect their duty to protect the public?

For years, Ministers have been warned of the desperate need for more prison places. Why, the Home Office's own statisticians predict we may need another 20,000 by 2011.

Even if Home Secretary John Reid gets round to providing all the 8,000 extra places he promises - and there's precious little sign of that - he'll still be more than 12,000 short.

Who knows how many more Wendy Billings will have to pay with their lives for the Government's abject failures?

Remember Tony Blair's promise, all those years ago, to be 'tough on crime'? Of all his empty pledges, it's turning out to be the emptiest of the lot

What it means to be British is complicated! (No it is not!)

Nobby sent me a link to the BBC News article entitled "Yorkshire clan linked to Africa".
In the article it tells us that research by two scientists, Turi King and Mark Jobling have shown that some men in Yorkshire have a genetic link to African Tribes going back centuries.

It then goes onto tell us therefore that:

"...... showed that Britain has always been composed of a mosaic of different people.
Professor Jobling echoed this view: "This study shows that what it means to be British is complicated and always has been," he said.
"Human migration history is clearly very complex, particularly for an island nation such as ours, and this study further debunks the idea that there are simple and distinct populations or 'races'."


What a blatant attempt to continue this "Britain is a nation of immigrants" crap. This is a further attack on the British identity, a concerted effort to justify the MASS immigration into this country and the continued displacement of the indigenous population from huge swathes of this country.

Well you know what, I consider this to be a non swearing block otherwise I would be saying to the two scientist, f$£% you and %'##k your research. Next they will be telling us that people who lived here in 1066 or whenever did not procreate and produce children who then lived on and did the same down the years, perhaps they will show us that each generation was supplemented with economic migrants to make up the numbers.

I've had enough of this crap. You go along with legislation that is put in place to ensure that there is integration, you try to understand the curtailing of free speech to allow for multiculturalism, but we are beyond that now. This country is no longer about multiculturalism, it is no longer about integration, it is about the wholesale destruction of British identity.

Also on the BBC news site is the discussion about teaching children what it is to be British, just like you teach French or History. How dare they. How dare they treat the generations of people who have called this Island home as if all our traditions, culture, achievements and way of life is something to be learnt on a wet afternoon in April.

I am white, I am British, my parents are, their parents were, their grand parents were, and theirs before them etc. I am sick and tired of all this crap about what it is to be British, to me if you have to ask the question!

I do not nor would ever condone verbal attacks on other ethnic groups or other nationalities and I damn sure won't accept it when it is aimed at me.

The sooner that this Government with it's anti-white and anti-British policies is voted out the better.

Something I made to fit the findings I wanted

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

BNP, UKIP, Socialism, Conservatism!

Interesting article in the Telegraph regarding UKIP and the Conservatives, nice piece by EU Referendum and especially interested that others are nodding towards the BNP as the New Conservatives!

But, for those who would not now vote for UKIP even if hell froze over, there are other options, not least the British National Party. The problem here is that, although it is branded "extreme right-wing", it is in fact a far-left party. And while UKIP is capturing the disaffected right, BNP is Hoovering up votes from the disaffected old Labour left. In the heady days of the Thatcher revolution, these were the people - the "White van man" - who gravitated to the Conservatives and gave them 18 years of power.

Perversely, while the leaders of the main parties would all like to claim the mantle of Thatcher, the recipient of her now disillusioned support is Nick Griffin, the leader of the BNP. Effectively, he is the true heir of Thatcherism.


EU Referendum link: The wilderness is getting rather crowded
Telegraph link: Cameron mocks the 'loonies and fruitcakes' of UKIP at his peril

Criminals to get free passes under Nu Labour


I knew 2007 was going to be a very interesting year for Britain, but I really didn't expect so much to have already happened. It's not even the end of January and yet we already have the melt down of law and order in this country, but guess what, it's all for the benefit of the taxpayer.

Desperate Ministers will beg judges to stop sending criminals to prisons - because they are full.
A letter will be sent to courts across the country admitting that jails are officially in crisis.
It pleads for only the most violent or dangerous criminals to be given a custodial sentence. Magistrates are also being asked to allow bail to all but the most serious crime suspects.


It urges that suspects such as burglars be bailed rather than remanded and follows on from Mr Reid's recent statement that taxpayers' money should not be 'squandered' on locking up or monitoring offenders who would be better punished in the community.

Ah, so as usual it is for our benefit that criminals will be allowed to act with impunity!

How many additional victims will be created due to the incompetence of this Government? Should all victims of crime be able to sue the Government for negligence when they are attacked by someone who should have been behind bars. No wonder the Government has no interest in mandatory sentencing when it needs to change the rules on a daily basis.

Mr Reid has promised that there will be an additional 8000 places in the spring so does that mean offences committed in the next few months will receive lesser sentences than those later on in the year?

And when will the new prison places be available, just in time for the May elections perhaps?

And one final question, why the sudden massive explosion in the prison population, in the number of people awaiting trial and the number of people who would ordinarily have gone to prison if there had been room? Surely it's not down to, no wait, just let me move this elephant out of the way.

Britain under Nu Labour, criminals never had it so good.

Ministers beg judges - don't jail any more criminals!

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

School faces court battle over veil ban

Just a quick post as off out for the evening. Nobby sent me this link about the new row over veils in schools.

No point me commenting as there are already 81 comments and rising.

Sometimes you have just got to believe that the time is approaching when common sense will once again prevail.

School faces court battle over veil ban

BBC - Orwellian Newspeak claim.

Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre has accused the BBC of "perverting political discourse".

"The BBC, which glories in being open-minded is, in fact, a closed thought-system, operating a kind of Orwellian newspeak," said Mr Dacre.

Mr Dacre, who was delivering the annual Hugh Cudlipp lecture at the London College of Communication, also stated that Mr Cameron should not take the Mail's support for granted at the next election.

"The Mail's a Conservative paper. It would be very surprising if we didn't support the Conservatives.
"Whether the present Conservative party is Conservative I don't know. We shall see," said Mr Dacre.

Could the Daily Mail be contemplating the unthinkable?

As I said in a previous post, "who knows, a vote for the BNP in the future could in fact be a vote for conservatism!!!!"
(yes I know there is also UKIP and the Greens!)

Mail editor slams 'Orwellian' BBC

Law 'threat' to Catholic adoption


Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor has written to the Cabinet to say church teaching prevented its agencies placing children with homosexual couples.
He says forcing agencies to act against their consciences would constitute discrimination against Catholics.

The Equality Act is due to come into effect in April.
It outlaws discrimination in the provision of goods, facilities and services on the basis of sexual orientation in a similar way to rules on sex and race discrimination.

Although I do not support discrimination against any group in principle, I am totally against any organisation or legislation that prevents discrimination by discriminating against others

The problem with Nu Labours desire to outlaw discrimination in any form is that it has to discriminate in order to not discriminate! Now we have the example in which the Equality Act will place the rights of homosexuals not to be discriminated against above the right of Religious Groups to have the freedom of conscience and religion; in other words, everyone is equal in their right not to be discriminated against, but some are more equal than others.

Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor says Roman Catholic teaching about the foundations of family life rules out the choice of homosexual adoptive parents.
The cardinal said the closure of the seven agencies would represent a wholly avoidable "tragedy".
Its agencies are said to handle 4% or about 200 of all adoptions a year but about a third of those children judged difficult to place.
BBC Religious Affairs Correspondent Robert Pigott said the letter suggests the Catholic Church is ready for a fight.

Well it is about time that they did put up a fight. A certain other religious group in this country continues to grow in influence due to the vocal nature of it's "congregation".
Interestingly enough, this new legislation also conflicts with their views on sexuality, and so left unchallenged, Nu Labour could well have to face the ignominy of presiding over a contest between homophobia and islamaphobia.

Monday, January 22, 2007

Not fit for purpose 2

Having previously commented about the policewoman who seems unable to carry out her duties on religious grounds, it appears that we need not worry. Although the reasons may be different, it appears that she may be in good company when it comes to being unable to take appropriate action.

The Metropolitan Police are routinely issuing cautions to muggers, it was revealed today.
The force handed out 329 cautions for street robbery last year - even though the offence carries up to five years in prison.

Now according to the Home Office, a caution is 'a warning given to adults who admit they are guilty of first-time minor offences, such as vandalism or petty theft'.

So mugging doesn't really come into this category, nor does the 474 cautions given for burglary or the 617 for car theft, or the 1,477 for drug possession excluding cannabis, or the 5,216 for shoplifting, or the 5,955 for assault, excluding common assault.

A police spokeswoman said: "Every case is considered on an individual basis and the overriding factors are whether a caution is appropriate to the offence and the offender and whether a caution is likely to be effective in the circumstances.
"The aims of the caution are to deal quickly and simply with less serious offences, to divert offenders where appropriate from appearing in the criminal courts and to reduce the likelihood of re-offending."

Reduce the likelihood of re-offending! Who is she trying to kid, a caution for violent assault and burglary is no deterrent whatsoever.
The problem is that with the police unwilling to defend the law abiding citizen the temptation might be to fight back yourself. I bet if you do, you won't be let off with a caution.

Unfortunately as with more and more of Britain's institutions, the British Police Service is not fit for purpose.

Violent criminals escape prosecution

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Shameless!



No I'm not referring to the new series of the Channel Four comedy drama about the family from Manchester, rather another family who currently hail from London but who would certainly give the Gallaghers a run for their money.

The Human Rights Act, the modern day criminal and terrorists charter, does in fact appear to provide more than just a cover to prevent photographs of escaped prisoners being published, or terrorists and illegal immigrants from being deported.

And who better to exploit the provisions of her husbands, sorry, Her Majesty's Governments legislation than one of the top Human Rights Lawyers in the land.

"Cherie Blair accused Britain’s top civil servant of violating her human rights as he tried to rein in her fondness for freebies, it was claimed yesterday.
She left the Cabinet Secretary ‘gobsmacked’ by claiming she was entitled to cut-price designer clothes under the Human Rights Act.
And she repeatedly argued with officials over claims that she tried to exploit her position to make money. "


Although the revelations have been dismissed by a Downing Street spokesman as mostly untrue or widely exaggerated tittle-tattle, it does appear that as with most things Blair (or Nu Labour) there are more questions than answers.

"Among the clothes Mrs Blair is said to have acquired was a £10,000 red and gold brocade dress by Lindka Cierach which she wore to an awards ceremony in October 2003 and again at a dinner in Nigeria the following month.
When Sir Andrew criticised her over the discounts, she reportedly told him he was infringing her rights ‘under Article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights on an individual’s right to do as they like with their own property’. "


In all the confusion over gifts, holidays and the like, it might be useful if extra assistance was made available on the day that the Blairs move out of No 10. After all, it might have only taken one removal truck to move them in, but who knows how many it will take to move them out?

Blair's right to freebies

Big Brother - the final word.

Although I had thought the Big Brother bull%&$* might have passed, a piece in the Daily Mail confirms how desperate some "people" are to perpetuate certain stereotypes.

The Big Brother race row could have repercussions for the UK's tourist trade, a Visit Britain official has said.
Bernard Donoghue, Head of Government and Public Affairs at the national tourism agency, said visitors from India were worth £226 million to the UK economy.


He told GMTV's Sunday Programme: "Our brand of Britain is universally seen around the world as welcoming, friendly, tolerant, accepting and inviting."

Mr Donoghue said he was confident the problem could be managed by promoting events such as the "Bollywood Oscars", being held in Yorkshire later this year.
He said: "That's a fantastic opportunity to prove how we celebrate Bollywood in a way that maybe Channel 4 has not done this week."


Look I know the man has a job to do, but what the hell is he talking about?

This is Britain, we have our own unique culture, our own customs and traditions going back hundreds if not thousands of years. That is what we should be celebrating and what should be central to any so called Brand of Britain. Yes we are tolerant, friendly, accepting and inviting, traditions which are deeply rooted in the British culture and do not require apologies such as "proving how we celebrate Bollywood. "

Anyone who stays away as a result of comments by one or more individual on a trash TV programme would only be demonstrating their own bigotry and ignorance.

Fortunately not every nation in the world has been overrun with the self loathing and hypocrisy that appears to have taken firm root in this one, and so most people are far too sensible to pay any attention to this media contrived nonsense.

Big Brother race row 'could hit tourism'

Not fit for purpose!


In a mature, democratic, intelligent society, one accepts that for many jobs there may well be one or two prerequisites. To be a Veterinary Surgeon one must be academically qualified, to be a driver one must have a certain level of eyesight and have passed a test, employment in the fire service requires a certain level of fitness and so on.

So what about the police service, how about a serving police officer who is not able to touch half of all members of the public? Ridiculous, silly, that would never happen!

Well remember, this is Blair's (and Brown's) Britain, and here commonsense gives way all the time to political correctness and the appeasement of certain religions.

A muslim woman police officer has sparked a new debate by refusing to shake hands with Britain's most senior police chief for religious reasons.
The incident happened at a passing-out parade where Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair was inspecting a line-up of 200 recruits.


In addition to refusing a traditional congratulatory handshake from Sir Ian, the WPC - who wore a traditional Muslim hijab headscarf - also declined to be photographed with him as she did not want the picture used for 'propaganda purposes'.

The woman had earlier insisted that it was contrary to her religious teaching for her to touch a man.

Imagine another police officer on patrol who is attacked and calls upon this colleague to assist, what will be the response?

Is it not enough that we have police officers refusing to protect certain sectors of society due to their religious beliefs? It is completely outrageous.

Thousands of applications are turned down each year by young men and women who would love to be police officers, warts and all.

By all means recruit from minority groups if it will ensure an all inclusive police service, but one thing must be certain, the recruits themselves must be fit for purpose.

Unable to carry out my duties

EU police powers or police state?


According to the Observer:

"The EU faces a damaging split over moves led by Germany to impose a radical law and order package. If enacted into European legislation, it would allow armed police to operate with impunity outside their home countries, privatised armed 'sky marshals' on civilian flights and a wide range of joint operations against alleged illegal migrants."

"The plans are provoking opposition in Whitehall and among senior British police officers. Many of them recall how, in 1996, a Dutch parliamentary inquiry revealed that tonnes of illegal drugs had been exported from the Netherlands to Britain with the assistance of Dutch undercover agents, who had allowed informants to run amok.
'We have learnt the hard way how difficult it is to regulate undercover operations,' one source said, citing a series of high-profile Customs and Excise cases that collapsed in the Court of Appeal after irregularities came to light. 'We need to be extremely wary.'"


When I first read it I was of the opinion that it should be opposed at all costs, but when you consider that most of the law of this land is dictated by Europe, why not have a European police force. After all, detection rates in some police "service" areas are as high as 3%, could foreign police "forces" do any worse?

Mind you, the EU does not have a good reputation for the practical application of cooperation

For example, what was the response when Mr Reid faced the first crisis over prisons last year, and asked his European counterparts to accommodate some of their nationals currently in British jails? NO,NO,NO,NO,NO!

You see, when it comes to Europe it is always a one way street.
I don't blame the EU, after all the same principal applies here as to most things, if you don't like it, leave. No, the problem unsurprisingly is with Nu Labour who are determined to finish off any independence this country has, and they are making good progress.

So why not let foreign armed police into Britain, let them make the news by either shootings in public or lots of high profile arrests, after all, when you consider that the majority of new applications to the Northern Ireland police service were from Polish Nationals, we're half way there already.

Of course, a radical alternative might be to consider the EU as a trade partnership instead of allowing it to continue imposing it's will on oppressed Nations who at no time voted for it, but then, that would be called democracy, and this is Great Britain after all!

EU faces split on police powers