Labour 'facing large BNP challenge'

Jon Cruddas said the BNP was putting up 750 candidates - more than double the 350 it fielded in last year's local elections in England. Actually I believe it is 828!

The MP for Dagenham, east London, where the BNP won 11 council seats last year, said the BNP was "thriving" in some poor areas - particularly former Labour heartlands, where it was positioning itself as an alternative to the main parties. The BNP is thriving in plenty of areas, many of which are not poor at all as I am sure will be shown in the upcoming elections.

"The BNP is attempting to capitalise on peoples feelings of insecurity," he said.
Hmm, I wonder where this insecurity comes from?

"We have less than a month to convince people that the BNP represent a very real threat to communities and they should not be considered as a viable alternative to the mainstream parties or even to register a protest vote."

A threat to communities. I'm sorry Mr Cruddas but very few people are listening to you and your kind anymore. Why would we be interested in anything you have to say. We have had 10 years of Nu Labour during which time you could easily have convinced us that there is no viable alternative to your party by improving the country rather than turning it into the depraved lawless s&*t hole that it now is.

No, we have seen what it is to be run by Nu Labour, we have heard from both the other main parties that we could expect more of the same from them.

All this thugs, racist, sleaze anti-British crap you and your kind continue to spout doesn't wash anymore.

In the words of an honorable politician and patriot to his country:

"You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time."

Your time is up.

Cruddas

Ordinary Citizen

A bit pressed for time today so I am posting an interesting piece off a political website. (Let me know if not ok)

I feel it sums up the views of many many people.


"A Daily Mirror reader has had an interesting and in our opinion, accurate letter printed in that newspaper - which, as we all know, is currently engaged in campaigning against the BNP on behalf of the Labour Party. On a point of fact the author of the letter is incorrect on one small point - the Daily Mirror is not owned by a "millionaire" (the thief, Robert Maxwell is long gone - thank goodness) but by the largely foreign-owned Trinity Mirror Group - yes - the Daily Mirror and the scores of local newspapers owned by that financially struggling group, is largely foreign owned!

The Letter.

Let’s face it Ros, this "campaign" is a very wispy smoke screen to cover a direct attack on the BNP and its policies just before the May elections.As such it is the type of subterfuge to get around the rules on election expenditure which we have come to expect from Nu Labour and its supporters i.e. although it’s an abuse of the spirit of the law it does not quite break it!

Your multimillionaire and Labour supporting publisher (who controls your copy through his control of who is editor) knows Labour has lost the trust of whole swathes of the white working class who predominantly make up the Mirrors readership.
They also know much of this support has gone to the BNP rather than the Liberals or the Tories, so he is using his ability to buy influence (i.e. the resources of this paper) to attack both individual members of the BNP like Nick Griffin and the party itself in this campaigns handout.

All hate and no hope there then!

It is therefore farcical to claim shock or indignation when the BNP point out the hollowness of your message in their opinion.Why didn't you offer a link to their response so that readers could decide for themselves?

Because you are afraid of allowing people to make there own mind up, rather than having you filter it and put your own spin as usual?

Please no nonsense about not wanting to promote hate, that excuse has well past its sell by date I am afraid.

Really, it’s about time you realised we ordinary people are not as gullible as we once unfortunately were. We just don’t trust you anymore, because you have proven false time after time.

Just take a long hard look at who actually attends your events; the only ordinary people you will find are there for the freebies, not because they share your beliefs, so stop kidding yourselves.

The British people are very angry and getting more so by the day, not with immigrants, asylum seekers or the BNP, but with the likes of you who have brought this country to an all time low and insist we should be grateful.

Maybe someday you can explain to the mothers of the child groomer’s victims up north how their children were selected because the perpetrators were "poor" and that the fact that none of the victims were Muslim was for the same reason.

Maybe you can explain to the school leaver who is best qualified for the job that his grandfather and father had that he can't have it because he is a native Britain and it must go to someone of another race who is less qualified because of "positive" discrimination and quotas.

Maybe you can explain why it is not raciest to imply that because they are mostly white an organisation the police is incapable of dealing fairly with other racial groups in their communities and needs lots of "ethnic" recruits but it would be raciest for a mainly white neighbourhood to ask for a white bobby.

Maybe you can explain why it’s still common for mainly white old people to have their care home shut, to freeze to death or to starve on a hospital ward because there is "no money" to keep it open, fund their heating bill (or explain how to claim the grant) or have someone to feed them so they don't choke.

But there is money to house thousands of asylum seekers and economic migrants, print government leaflets in every language under the sun (and fund translation services) and treat African Nationals with Aid’s for £250,000 a pop.

You don’t get more hateful than allowing your own old to die as far as most people are concerned, especially when you have the tax money and CHOOSE to spend it elsewhere.

Truly if anyone displays hatred it is those who perpetuate or support myths about the BNP. They create a climate in which people who do not share your views face violence and intimidation not for what they actually say or do but because of what campaigns like this say about them.

Oh, and if you ever want to see a baying mob, spitting, hurling abuse and desperate to attack people because they dare to be different from what the mob feels acceptable try watching an ANTI BNP demo, that is pure mindless hate at its worst as many a policeman would testify if his job were not on the line.

Still let’s try and remain positive.

At least the shrinking band of well healed mostly white middle class multiculturalists you represent are increasingly seen by both the native population and the disparate bands of other races as increasingly irrelevant. It is we as separate and unique cultural groups who will have to work to create the future, not those who seek to paper over the fault lines they have created purely out of a hatred of this countries people and culture.

Now I know that you will not put this up (although you may edit it to suit your ends), so why did I bother writing it. Well in the spirit of Hope, all be it a probably very forlorn one, that you will realize you are the problem not the solution.

That your creed is as about as raciest as it gets, because it is so anti the ordinary people of these lands and their right to a space of their own to practice their ancient culture that it fails to see its own hypocrisy.

You support the claims of Aborigines in Australia, Native Americans but not the British – mad when you think about it!"

Two Hundred Thousand Asylum Seekers to get Amnesty

Up to 200,000 asylum seekers will be allowed to remain in Britain because Home Office officials admit they will never be able to track them down.
The extraordinary amnesty is the latest embarrassment for Home Secretary John Reid, who has staked his reputation on his pledge to make the department 'fit for purpose'.
So says the article in the Daily Mail: Nu Labour Failure - Again

Home Office officials also stated that 18,000 immigrants are set to be deported because they have committed crimes in the UK.

18000 immigrants - a quarter of the prison population, 25%.

A Home Office spokesperson said: "We remain confident that we will be able to clear the entire current legacy of cases by July 2011."

2011 - 4 years from now, and yet still they come!

John Reid has staked his reputation on his pledge to make the department fit for purpose. Where to start! The only reputation Mr Reid has is the one he shares with the rest of the reckless, duplicitous, anti-British traitors and liars that riddle this Government and NU Labour at all levels.

And as for embarrassment, don't make me laugh. When will people wake up to the fact that nothing embarrasses these people; they don't care about what you think of them, they don't care what you think of their policies, they don't care what you think of what they have done to your country, they don't care about you at all, not even the tiniest bit.

Nu Labour may have already caused irreparable damage to this country, and yet where are the voices of opposition? Looking to Cameron or Campbell for any sort of opposition is a total waste of time. They stand idly by as this country is turned into the cesspool of the world.

Is it not enough that we have seen our freedoms severely curtailed, taxes raised to an all time high, waiting times (real waiting times not massaged Government figures) for medical treatment at an all time high, deaths in hospital from super bugs at an all time high, huge numbers of the population unable to get access to a dentist, unemployment (real unemployment not massaged Government figures) at an all time high, crime rates (real crime rates not massaged Government figures) at an all time high, our Armed Forces reduced to third world levels and no longer able to provide the necessary support for our brave service men and women, Health and safety rules beyond all reason, stiffer sentences for dropping a Ginsters wrapper than for committing assault, speeding motorists surcharged to pay for domestic violence teams!, being told to apologise (and pay compensation) for something that came to an end 200 years ago (200 years for f%$#s sake), and many many many other things that have befallen our once great nation.

As a well known man recently said: "I am conscious that when an essential core of our democratic freedom risks being undermined, subsequent generations will hold to account those who were able to raise their voices yet stayed silent."

Where are the voices of opposition?

I'll tell you where, HERE!

BNP, UKIP, Socialism, Conservatism!

Interesting article in the Telegraph regarding UKIP and the Conservatives, nice piece by EU Referendum and especially interested that others are nodding towards the BNP as the New Conservatives!

But, for those who would not now vote for UKIP even if hell froze over, there are other options, not least the British National Party. The problem here is that, although it is branded "extreme right-wing", it is in fact a far-left party. And while UKIP is capturing the disaffected right, BNP is Hoovering up votes from the disaffected old Labour left. In the heady days of the Thatcher revolution, these were the people - the "White van man" - who gravitated to the Conservatives and gave them 18 years of power.

Perversely, while the leaders of the main parties would all like to claim the mantle of Thatcher, the recipient of her now disillusioned support is Nick Griffin, the leader of the BNP. Effectively, he is the true heir of Thatcherism.


EU Referendum link: The wilderness is getting rather crowded
Telegraph link: Cameron mocks the 'loonies and fruitcakes' of UKIP at his peril

BBC - Orwellian Newspeak claim.

Daily Mail editor Paul Dacre has accused the BBC of "perverting political discourse".

"The BBC, which glories in being open-minded is, in fact, a closed thought-system, operating a kind of Orwellian newspeak," said Mr Dacre.

Mr Dacre, who was delivering the annual Hugh Cudlipp lecture at the London College of Communication, also stated that Mr Cameron should not take the Mail's support for granted at the next election.

"The Mail's a Conservative paper. It would be very surprising if we didn't support the Conservatives.
"Whether the present Conservative party is Conservative I don't know. We shall see," said Mr Dacre.

Could the Daily Mail be contemplating the unthinkable?

As I said in a previous post, "who knows, a vote for the BNP in the future could in fact be a vote for conservatism!!!!"
(yes I know there is also UKIP and the Greens!)

Mail editor slams 'Orwellian' BBC

Union Support!

(Thanks Nobby)

Whilst I was over at the Love Music, Hate Racism web site, I noticed comments from two union officials:

John F Smith, General Secretary, Musicians’ Union:
“Our official stance is that the MU deplores the BNP and everything it stands for. We are affiliated to anti racist organisations and we join with the TUC in openly condemning the BNP’s attempts to portray itself as part of mainstream UK politics. Whilst this person has a right to her own personal political views, I believe that the company, as a recipient of public funds, must act in order to maintain its position as a ‘flagship’ for equality and fairness in the arts, and to maintain credibility in the work that it does in the community. Quite how it acts is a matter for the ENB Board.”

Gerry Morrissey, deputy General Secretary, Bectu:
“Simone Clarke earns her living in the subsidised arts and with this goes certain responsibilities, with which she has failed to comply. She has brought our industry into disrepute.”

I really need not comment on what I think of the above but it is interesting to note that there finally appears to be some mature, democratic thinking from at least one union.

Union offers help to BNP ballerina

Equity has offered its assistance to the ballerina at the centre of protests about her membership of the British National Party.
Simone Clarke, an English National Ballet principal and Equity deputy who was revealed as being a BNP member in December, was greeted by placards outside her final performance of Giselle this month, with members of the anti-racist Unite Against Fascism group calling for the company to sack her and some protesters reported to have shouted out at Clarke mid-performance inside the London Coliseum.
This week, Equity has come out in support of the performer’s right to work. According to the union’s rule 3B (p) it “acknowledge[s] the right of individual members to hold and express their personal political and other beliefs both in their private and professional capacities”.
Equity spokesman Martin Brown added: “If ENB were to treat her unfairly, that is something we would expect to represent her for. The law forbids someone from being sacked for their legal political beliefs.

I find the final sentence to be very interesting:

The law forbids someone from being sacked for their legal political beliefs.

Funny how it does not seem to bother any other union or indeed all those politicians and high profile “celebrities" whose names are listed on the UAF website!

Stage

Give us the facts

Whilst having my weekly trawl through the many diverse sites on the Internet, my attention was drawn to a comment on the Love Music, Hate Racism web site.

The comment was by Sadiq Khan MP:

“The BNP now has 14 councillors in London, and have gained ground on the back of a rise in racism. In the recent, council elections, the BNP declared that this was a “referendum on Islam”, and they are dividing communities with vicious, racist lies.
It is vital that we tackle the BNP head on and start a united campaign now to stop them making further electoral gains in the 2008 Greater London Assembly elections – the work of Love Music, Hate Racism is vital in celebrating diversity, not extremism. We have to out the BNP for what they really stand for, build strong coalitions of support, and ensure that we involve all communities in a shared and inclusive notion of what it means to be British in the 21st century.”

Now, in any Democracy, such as the one we once lived in, it is up to everyone to have a say in what it was to be of that nation, i.e. in this context, British. No Democratic society should be allowed to marginalise elements of it's citizens because they may have a different idea of what it is to be of that nation. To deny them the opportunity to have a say is to act in a fascist manner, something that anti-nationalist groups seem to embrace far too easily.

Whether your support is for the BNP, UKIP, The Green Party, The National Front, The Conservatives, or even heaven help us Nu Labour, you have the duty to allow, and the right to hear the views of the other parties, providing that their content is legal.

Mr Sadiq Khan - ..... "they are dividing communities with vicious, racist lies."

Put up or shut up.

And this weeks winner is....... (warning - longish post, plenty of waffle!)

It appears that I have been named blog of the week by Central News, it’s quite an honour for a blog that is only 2 months old to be named Blog of the week by anyone!

Looking at the previous blogs of the week on Central News, I hope I didn't make it in for similar reasons to Spicy Cauldron; that would be disappointing!

Central News is run by a supporter of the BNP and therefore if I was to follow current convention I would have to write some sort of disclaimer stating that whilst I support free speech, I do no want anyone to think I have any association with their heinous views and diabolical actions, etc. etc. yada yada yada!

Perhaps I could say that it is a shame that people are drawn to such a party by the BNP's ability to exploit tensions in areas of the country, perhaps I should decry the BNP stance on putting British people first, their views on immigration, Christianity or the fact they hate Jews!

But you see, to do any of that would be to speak the words of someone else or to repeat someone else’s views. I prefer to look at things myself, to make up my own mind having looked at things from all sides.

As I said in a previous post, I have always had a passing interest in politics but like most people the interest tended to focus mostly on interest rates, taxes and that sort of thing.Through the years I confess that at various times I have voted for all the main parties and indeed a few minor ones. The main criterion for my decision has always been the individual candidate regardless of which party they belong to. Obviously they will tend to have a certain outlook based on which party they represent, but there is many an excellent councillor or MP who do an extremely good job for their constituents despite the party they represent.

I work in the service sector and I meet lots of different people each week, old people, young people, people from various ethnic backgrounds and social groups, and we often have time for a chat over a cup of tea or coffee. Setting the world to rights is a favourite pastime for many people and the conversation always goes in the direction they choose, after all, the customer is always right.

Over a number of years I noticed that the topic of conversation started to change, from sports and the state of the health service, people started to talk about immigration, religion, law and order, lack of police and other currently hot topics. To start with it was in a matter of fact almost apologetic way, as if the failings in society are somehow everyone’s fault and we should all feel ashamed of ourselves.
More recently though, people tend to be a lot more open, concerns regarding Islamic terrorism, the force feeding of Halal meet to huge swathes of the population, children being taught all about every other religion in the world except Christianity, Mosques being built all over the place, lack of jobs for British workers, stupid EU regulation, lack of freedom of speech, Government snooping, to name but a few, have all come up.

Imagine that, British people so frustrated and ignored that rather than talk about the weather they would rather get their thoughts on all of the above off their chest to anyone who will listen.

On my favourites page I have a link to mediauk which has a link to all newspapers in this country. Once a week or so I spend a few hours looking at the local news in places up and down the land.

One thing that always strikes me is the difference between local news and national news. Traditionally one would expect the national news to cover the broader issues, take a look at the bigger picture and to offer more analysis of current events, whilst the local paper would cover school fetes and local rubbish collection times and that sort of thing.

That is certainly not the case anymore; local papers have become one of the only reliable sources of news, although there are some noticeable exceptions where they do not let the truth stand in the way of a good story.
Taking a look at a small cross section, one finds local problems caused due to overcrowding, immigration, violence between different cultural and ethnic groups, lack of local job prospects, breakdown of local services, increased violent crime, criticism of local police services and any number of other issues affecting people’s daily lives.

But where is the same attention to these issues from the National News Papers or the main television channels? The simple answer is that there is very little, and when there is it is always to play down the issues.

As a consequence, when incidents happen locally one may be forgiven for thinking that, because you don’t see the same thing happening in the national news, you are just unfortunate to be living in a problem area, and anyway things are not that bad.

Up and down the country people are living in local conditions that make them unhappy, and to add insult to injury they are made to feel that it is a local issue and therefore somehow it must be a local problem, and as they are local, somehow they must be part of the problem.

Keeping things on a local level makes it much easier to keep the problems under wrap. If it was clear that Eastern European immigration was putting British workers out of jobs up and down the country then God forbid, something might have to be done about it. But keep it local and it is easy to close down the argument by accusing locals of being xenophobic or racist and of exaggerating the issues, after all, if British workers weren’t so damned lazy we wouldn’t have to bring in this alternative workforce in the first place. In fact, it’s your own fault!

When the Religious and Racial Hatred Act was being debated I wrote to my local MP and asked what his party intended to do about the continued erosion of free speech. I pointed out that the situation was getting so bad that an increasing number of people would find themselves voting for the BNP as the only party that took the issue seriously. The response was rather patronising including the somewhat contradictory final statement:

“The Conservative party will continue to support all British Citizens regardless of their origins. I must point out that the BNP is a thoroughly nasty racist party, several of whose leading members have been convicted of criminal offences. No decent person should contemplate supporting them.”

To take this at face value I would be forced to believe that the BNP is full of degenerates and thugs, the sort of people who would think nothing of violent confrontations, hounding people out of their jobs, accepting bribes, deception and any number of other offences.

On the other hand, if one takes a slightly more considered approach, one could easily put together a list of several leading members of the Conservative party who have actually been to prison, and various blogs have lists of Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat Councillors, party members and the like, with convictions ranging from GBH and murder, through to embezzlement, sexual assault, corruption and voting fraud.

Then there are the recent demonstrations by United Against Fascism in which they protest against people whose political views they do not like by trying to have them removed from their job. They site the justification that the people who they are protesting against would take away other peoples jobs if they had the chance. This group and others like it are supported personally and financially by members of the three main parties.

Every business has its share of “bad eggs”, every supporters group, every religion, every political party, every organisation that incorporates a substantial number of people will end up with people that you could do with out, people that cause embarrassment and have a potential to undermine the success of that particular movement.

But you shouldn't engage with the BNP because they are racist and have a racist agenda in which they favour indigenous white British people!

This is where I am the most confused. How is that in any way different from having a Black Police Association, Asian Police Association, or any of the other hundreds of "Associations" set up to further the rights and ambitions of specific sectors of society. After all, success for a lot of these Associations must come at the expense of someone else. If they feel they are under funded, under resourced, under represented etc, this can only be addressed by removing funding or resources from elsewhere, or in the case of promotion and representation, hold other groups back.

I read today that it is totally wrong to discriminate against someone because of their colour as they are born that way, but the same commentator argued that it was not so bad to criticise Polish people for coming to Britain on the grounds that it is not racist because they are white too. But surely the reason some people do not want Polish people coming over here in the thousands is for the same reason they do not want thousands of people from Africa or Asia. It is nothing to do with colour, it is because an influx of too many people from a differing culture causes a dilution and potential undermining of one’s own. But to protest against Eastern European may be anti-EU or xenophobic, protest against African and Asian immigration and you are a nasty racist.

I have been the victim of racial abuse on a number of occasions, fortunately only verbal. Did I find it upsetting, yes I did, but no more so than any other daily random offensive behaviour aimed at me as I go about daily life in this country.

The last occasion was when a young man and his friends had stopped their car in the middle of the road to have a conversation with some others on the side of the road. I couldn’t get passed so having waited patiently for a minute or so I beeped my horn gently as most people would do. I was met with a torrent of abuse with several phrases calling into question my parentage in the context of being white, told that this particular area belonged to their ethnic grouping and people like me were not welcome there. Under today’s legislation and hysteria surrounding “racism” this could be seen as a very serious offence, and if it were not for the one sided application of the law, the youths may have been facing custodial sentences such as those already passed on several white defendants.

However, I remember when I used to drive to work through Broughton and up to Middleton when I was younger. White kids would stand in the middle of the road and threaten you if you asked them to move, I had my car window broken whilst sat at the traffic lights because someone wanted the packet of cigarettes on the passenger seat. The same sort of incident happens all the time up and down the country.

So is it racist behaviour when you offend someone of a different ethnic group to your own, or is it just offensive?

I have posted on lots of other Blogs, often on anti-BNP sites filled with the same vicious canards and always ask the same thing, give us the details. If the BNP is filled with the vile people you say it is, name them along with their crimes and publicly declared statements against humanity.

To date, all I have seen has been a failed attempt to convict two Senior Members of their party by introducing legislation that makes it an offence now, to say things it would have been ok to say a few years ago, whilst at the same time refusing to take action against other groups of people who have made similar remarks which have included specific threats against this nation.

Oh, there’s also a minibus driver who lost his job; his crime? Well if he drives the bus, other people may not like it and so THEY might attack the vehicle thereby endangering him and his fellow occupants.
And don’t forget the other high profile racist, thuggish, thoroughly nasty member of the BNP party and the serious criminal activities she is involved in? Well in fact, she isn't actually involved in anything criminal (unless you really dislike ballet); in fact she hasn't actually harmed anyone nor done anything wrong. But what she is guilty of is being a member of the BNP, that’s it, nothing else.

Politics is a funny game, one year you can vote for Nu Labour and elect a conservative Government and the next time you vote for Nu Labour you get a communist Government. Vote Conservative one time and that’s what you’ll get, next time round, vote Conservative and you’ll get a socialist Government.

A free democratic society is one in which all people are allowed to have a voice, regardless of whether you like what they have to say.

If the BNP is as described than we have nothing to fear because they will never be acceptable to the majority of British people and therefore we should listen to what they have to say and engage in debate on every occasion.

Debate is the way forward, stop the personal attacks and slanderous statements, give them enough rope and they will hang themselves; or will they? Who knows, a vote for the BNP in the future could in fact be a vote for conservatism.

In my younger days I used to be an avid reader of the fantastic 2000 AD comic. I remember one story in an episode of Judge Dredd in which a member of the public is being stoned before Judge Dredd intervenes and saves him. Everyone there is rounded up and interviewed at the section house as follows (condensed):

Dredd: You! What were you stoning him for?
Person 1: I-I don’t know sir
Dredd: What do you mean; you’re bouncing rocks off some poor sap’s skull and you don’t know why?
Person 1: I-I heard something … He did somethin’ or somethin’
Dredd: Do any of you know why you did this?
Person 2: Rover Johnson had it comin’! He was a bad guy. He’d done bad things.
Dredd: What bad things?
Person 2 I dunno .. There were rumours. The whole block knew.
Dredd: Knew what creep?
Person 2: You know – Rover Johnson had it comin’!
Dredd: So when did you first hear there was going to be a stoning?
Person 3: Yesterday morning, down in the Gossiperia. I figured, Well, I’m not doin’ anything tomorrow, might as well go along…
Person 4: No I didn’t know Rover Johnson personally, but I did hear some pretty unpleasant things!
Dredd: Be specific
Person 4: Well, there was … He… I … I’m not sure, really. Rumours – and not very nice ones!



So, do I support the BNP, well call me old fashioned but that is my business.

Should you support the BNP, well clearly, that is your business.


Central News

Major Political Parties support formation of Fascist British State.

The continued persecution of the so called BNP Ballerina, Simone Clarke, appears to have the full support of many prominent members of all three main political parities, including David Cameron and members of the Government.

Let's be clear, all the people listed on the contradictorily named "Unite Against Fascism" website appear to believe that anyone who is a member of a political party with views they do not like should have their job taken away from them.

Having been a lifelong supporter of one of the main parties I have to say that I am totally disgusted by their recent and current behaviour.

Seeing the cross section of people supporting this despicable action proves once and for all that the only difference between the three main parties is personalities. All three parties appear to have abandoned any pretence of free speech and the notion of democracy in favour of silencing critics who do not share their views.

It is also worth noting that the Chairman of the Black Police Officers Association is also in favour of this action, thereby rendering the quaint notion of an impartial police service null and void. Interestingly enough, there does not appear to be a representative of the White Police Officer's Association as a member, presumably this would be considered by some at the UAF to be too radical a step in the cause of freedom and equality.

The UAF tries to justify their behaviour by saying they are trying to prevent a political party gaining enough support so that it can carry out the sort of actions that the UAF themselves are engaged in.

To the best of my knowledge to date, their is no evidence to back up any of the assertions that members of the BNP are thugs, criminals (any more than members of the three main parties at least), or that they stir up racial hatred or distribute literature that has that objective. The current legislation in this country with regard to free expression is now so strict that one supposes were any BNP literature to contravene these repressive laws, immediate incarceration would follow.

The conclusion, however regrettable, seems to be that the BNP literature is telling the truth, and that it is this truth that the members and supporters of the main parties and the UAF do not wish us to hear.
Indeed, as time goes on, it is becoming clear that a lot of the information the BNP do provide is correct, and has been held back from the public by the usual suspects.

Action by the UAF and support offered by high profile politicians only provides further evidence of this countries complete slide from a democracy to a totalitarian state.

Anyone on the list with an ounce of decency or the tiniest desire to save this country from totalitarianism should stand up and say that the action being taken is wrong, wrong. wrong.

UAF supporters include:

Talking of Hypocrisy ..................

Just when you think that a left wing paper couldn't stoop any lower, the same people who brought you The BNP Ballerina now tell us that we shouldn't take it too seriously.

There is one thing that we shouldn't take seriously, and that is the rubbish that these newspapers write.

Link to Pub Philosopher: Nowt to do with us, guv! (2

The BNP Ballerina

Read what Simone Clarke has to say for herself in an interview with the Daily Mail:

The reason is summed up in one word: Immigration. It has, she told the undercover journalist who exposed her, "really got out of hand' - and today she maintains the BNP" are the only ones to take a stand' on the issue that she believes troubles the majority of voters, even though such views have led to her being branded a racist and a fascist. "Using the word immigration is now a greater crime than cold-blooded murder," she claims. "

Read it here: The BNP Ballerina

Leave her alone

Thanks to Nobby for drawing my attention to the article in the guardian about the persecution of ballerina Simone Clarke. I know this has been covered on a number of blogs but I just wanted to add my own personal view.

Support them or hate them, the BNP is a legal political party in this country. Their members have a point of view that does not contravene the law and they have every right to put forward their own agenda within these confines.

Up and down the country there are groups representing minorities, including some groups that are outlawed in other more civilised countries due to their links to terrorism. These groups are not hounded out of their jobs, indeed many are given our tax money in the form of grants. I disagree with the point of view of any number of these groups, but that does not give me the right to call for them to be sacked.

Recent opinion shows that the BNP can expect to poll up to 7% of the vote, and that is even with out all the appallingly biased reporting against them. That's a lot of people who have decided that they believe their own eyes when it comes to what is happening in this country, rather than the drivel they read and see in the main stream media.

Contrary to what the Labour MP and other members of the Racial "equality" people have said, Miss Clarke has never previously used her position to put forward the BNP agenda. Indeed it was the very same rag that glorifies in reporting her continued harassment that broke the news of her membership.

As we enter 2007, there appears to be no pretence of a free and fair society in this country, we are now overtaken by the likes of Mr Cruddas and the the so called equality councils that want us all to be equal, but some more equal than others!

No other party has to put up with the continued slander and libellous statements made against it. The continued venom spat out at the BNP is an embarrassment to this country and an affront to free speech. It does not do any of the three main parties any credit to behave in this manner and certainly affects the way I and many of the people I know view them.

Well I for one say to Mr Cruddas and all the main parties and media, produce a list of all the criminal activity and thuggish behaviour perpetrated by the BNP so that we may compare and contrast it with the membership of the three main parties. List the atrocities they have perpetrated, give us facts and figures, let us see for ourselves the heinous acts they are guilty of. Prove people like Simone Clarke and her fellow members wrong, once and for all.

Today is the first day of the new year, I think the time has come to put up or shut up.